Warning: The following is an in-depth rant about the nuances of British Literature and has nothing to do with swallows- European or otherwise.
What started out as a funny movie scene soon became something much more:
"
King Arthur: I am your king.
Woman: Well I didn't vote for you.
King Arthur: You don't vote for kings.
Woman: Well how'd you become king then?
[Angelic music plays... ]
King Arthur: The Lady of the Lake, her arm clad in the purest shimmering samite held aloft Excalibur from the bosom of the water, signifying by divine providence that I, Arthur, was to carry Excalibur. THAT is why I am your king.
Dennis: [interrupting] Listen, strange women lyin' in ponds distributin' swords is no basis for a system of government. Supreme executive power derives from a mandate from the masses, not from some farcical aquatic ceremony.
"
These are well-known lines from
Monty Python and the Quest for the Holy Grail. While watching that movie earlier tonight, I suddenly realized how horribly fact-confusing they are.
You see, Arthur did not become king when the Lady of the Lake gave him Excalibur. By then, he had already been king for a long time. Arthur was first recognized as king when he pulled the sword from the stone, making him "rightwise born king of all England." That sword was NOT Excalibur, but rather a different sword.
Later, Arthur receives Excalibur. In TH Whites'
Once and Future King, Arthur receives Excalibur when his previous sword is broken in battle. Other legends vary, but for the most part it is clear that Excalibur is NOT the sword Arthur pulled from the stone. Even in those versions where the swords are one and the same (the 1981 film Excalibur comes to mind), the Lady of the Lake plays no part in Arthur's ascendance to the throne.
Conclusion: as a movie,
The Quest for the Holy Grail is very humorous and enjoyable to watch. However, there are serious flaws in its interpretation of Arthurian Legend. Left unchecked, such flaws may degrade the populace's understanding of classic English Literature.
Please, PLEASE help stop the perpetuation of such muddled ideas.
PS And another thing: What's with Arthur's tunic having a sun on it? Everyone knows that the Pendragon arms were
Argent, a lion rampant statant or . That's not even disputable... *sigh*